Full transparency: This comparison is written by the QuickAltText team. We’ve researched thoroughly and present facts honestly, including areas where competitors excel.
Estimated reading time: 18 minutes | Last updated: June 2025 When evaluating options, bulk generation provides valuable perspective.
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Company Overview
- Detailed Pricing Comparison
- Feature-by-Feature Analysis
- Integration Methods
- Performance and Speed
- Best Use Case Scenarios
- Pros and Cons
- Customer Reviews Analysis
- Final Verdict
Executive Summary
Choosing the right alt text generator can dramatically impact your workflow efficiency, accessibility compliance, and SEO performance. This comprehensive comparison examines two leading solutions: QuickAltText (our Chrome extension) and alttext.ai (a multi-platform API service).
Quick Takeaway
| Criteria | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-conscious users | QuickAltText | $9.99/month for 1,500 images vs $39/month for 1,000 images |
| Multi-language needs | alttext.ai | 130+ languages vs English-primary focus |
| Quick implementation | QuickAltText | Install and use in 30 seconds |
| Developer teams | alttext.ai | Comprehensive API and integrations |
| WordPress users | Both viable | QuickAltText for simplicity, alttext.ai for automation |
Company Overview
QuickAltText: The Chrome Extension Specialist
Founded: 2024
Headquarters: United States
Focus: Browser-based alt text generation via Chrome extension
Mission: Making web accessibility effortless for content creators
Users: 2,000+ active users (as of June 2025)
QuickAltText emerged from a simple observation: content creators spend hours manually writing alt text, often producing inconsistent results. Our solution? A right-click Chrome extension that generates WCAG 2.2-compliant alt text in seconds, without leaving your browser.
alttext.ai: The API-First Platform
Founded: 2020 [1]
Headquarters: Not publicly disclosed
Focus: Multi-platform API service with various integrations
Mission: Automating alt text generation at scale
Users: 70,000+ customers served
alttext.ai positioned itself as a comprehensive solution for developers and enterprises, offering API access, CMS plugins, and automated workflows. Their strength lies in platform diversity and language support.
Detailed Pricing Comparison
Let’s break down the costs with complete transparency:
QuickAltText Pricing
| Plan | Price | Images/Month | Cost per Image | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | $0 | 100 (7 days) | $0.00 | Testing the service |
| Pro | $9.99/month | 1,500 | $0.0067 | Bloggers, small businesses |
| Agency | $49.99/month | 8,000 | $0.0062 | Agencies, large websites |
alttext.ai Pricing [2]
| Plan | Price | Credits | Cost per Image | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 25 one-time | $0.00 | Testing only |
| Starter | $5/month | 100 | $0.05 | Minimal usage |
| Pro | $39/month | 1,000 | $0.039 | Regular users |
| Premium | $139/month | 5,000 | $0.028 | High-volume users |
| Enterprise | $2,199/year | 120,000/year | $0.018 | Large organizations |
💰 Cost Analysis
For a typical content creator processing 1,000 images monthly: Modern solutions like free alternatives streamline this process significantly.
- QuickAltText Pro: $9.99 (with 500 images to spare)
- alttext.ai Pro: $39.00 (exactly 1,000 images)
- Savings with QuickAltText: $29.01/month (74% less expensive)
Annual savings: $348.12 by choosing QuickAltText
Feature-by-Feature Analysis
Core Features Comparison
| Feature | QuickAltText | alttext.ai | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Alt Text Generation | ✅ WCAG 2.2 optimized | ✅ AI-powered | Tie |
| Language Support | ❌ English-focused | ✅ 130+ languages | alttext.ai |
| Browser Extension | ✅ Chrome (primary) | ✅ Chrome & Firefox | alttext.ai |
| Right-Click Generation | ✅ Core feature | ✅ Available | QuickAltText |
| Bulk Processing | ❌ One at a time | ✅ Batch uploads | alttext.ai |
| API Access | ❌ Not available | ✅ Full REST API | alttext.ai |
| WordPress Integration | ✅ Via extension | ✅ Native plugin | alttext.ai |
| Speed | ✅ 1.6 seconds | ✅ 2-3 seconds | QuickAltText |
| Offline Capability | ❌ Requires internet | ❌ Requires internet | Tie |
| Custom Styling Guide | ✅ WCAG focused | ❌ Generic output | QuickAltText |
Advanced Features
| Feature | QuickAltText | alttext.ai |
|---|---|---|
| E-commerce Integration | Manual via extension | Shopify, WooCommerce, Magento apps |
| CMS Support | Any via browser | Contentful, Hygraph, Strapi |
| Image Format Support | JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF | JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF, SVG |
| Max Image Size | 10MB | 16MB |
| Zapier Integration | ❌ | ✅ |
| Team Collaboration | Individual accounts | Team management features |
| White Label Options | ❌ | Enterprise only |
Integration Methods
QuickAltText Integration
Primary Method: Chrome Extension
- Install from Chrome Web Store (30 seconds)
- Sign in with email
- Right-click any image → “Generate Alt Text”
- Copy or apply directly (where supported)
Supported Platforms via Extension:
- WordPress admin
- Any web-based CMS
- Social media platforms
- Email marketing tools
- Google Docs/Slides
alttext.ai Integration Options
Multiple Integration Paths:
- Direct Plugins
- WordPress plugin (native)
- Shopify app
- WooCommerce extension
- Magento marketplace app
- API Integration
- REST API with documentation
- Webhook support
- Batch processing endpoints
- No-Code Options
- Zapier workflows
- Make (Integromat) scenarios
- IFTTT applets (coming soon)
- Browser Extensions
- Chrome extension
- Firefox add-on
Performance and Speed
Generation Speed Test Results
We tested both services with identical images across different categories:
| Image Type | QuickAltText | alttext.ai | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product photo | 1.4 seconds | 2.8 seconds | 2x faster |
| Infographic | 1.8 seconds | 3.1 seconds | 1.7x faster |
| Portrait | 1.5 seconds | 2.5 seconds | 1.6x faster |
| Landscape | 1.6 seconds | 2.9 seconds | 1.8x faster |
| Average | 1.6 seconds | 2.8 seconds | 1.75x faster |
Note: Tests conducted on 100Mbps connection, results may vary based on server load and location
Quality Comparison
Both services produce high-quality alt text, but with different approaches: The capabilities of api comparison address these specific challenges.
QuickAltText Output Style:
- Concise, WCAG 2.2 optimized
- Focus on essential information
- Typically 80-125 characters
- Screen reader friendly
Example: “Professional woman presenting quarterly sales data on laptop screen in modern office”
alttext.ai Output Style:
- More detailed descriptions
- Variable length (50-200 characters)
- Sometimes includes colors/mood
- Can be customized via API
Example: “A professional businesswoman in a blue blazer presenting colorful quarterly sales charts on her silver laptop screen in a bright, modern office environment with plants in the background”
Best Use Case Scenarios
When to Choose QuickAltText
Ideal for:
- Content Creators & Bloggers
- Writing posts directly in CMS
- Need quick alt text while creating content
- Budget-conscious (under $10/month)
- Small Business Owners
- Managing own website
- Limited technical knowledge
- Occasional image updates
- Social Media Managers
- Creating accessible social posts
- Working across multiple platforms
- Need speed over automation
- Freelancers & Agencies
- Working on client sites
- Need flexible tool that works anywhere
- Want predictable monthly costs
When to Choose alttext.ai
Ideal for:
- E-commerce Stores
- Thousands of product images
- Need bulk processing
- Want platform-specific integrations
- International Websites
- Multi-language requirements
- Global audience
- Need 130+ language support
- Development Teams
- Building custom workflows
- Need API access
- Automated pipelines
- Large Enterprises
- 100,000+ images annually
- Multiple team members
- Compliance requirements
Pros and Cons
QuickAltText
✅ Pros: The capabilities of image attributes pro address these specific challenges.
- Significantly cheaper (74% less for comparable usage)
- Fastest generation speed (1.6 seconds average)
- Dead simple to use – right-click and done
- WCAG 2.2 compliance built-in
- No technical setup required
- Works on any website via browser
- Transparent, predictable pricing
- Excellent for manual workflows
❌ Cons:
- English language only (currently)
- No bulk processing
- No API for developers
- Chrome-only (Firefox coming soon)
- Limited automation options
- No native CMS plugins
- Newer company (less established)
alttext.ai
✅ Pros:
- 130+ language support
- Multiple integration options
- Bulk processing capabilities
- Developer-friendly API
- Native plugins for major platforms
- Established with 70,000+ users
- Supports more image formats (AVIF, SVG)
- Automation via Zapier
❌ Cons:
- 3.9x more expensive for most users
- Slower generation (2.8 seconds average)
- Complex pricing structure
- Overkill for simple use cases
- Requires more technical setup
- Limited free tier (25 images only)
- Annual commitment for best pricing
Customer Reviews Analysis
QuickAltText User Feedback
Based on Chrome Web Store reviews and user feedback [3]:
Positive themes:
- “Saves me hours every week” – Content Creator
- “Finally, alt text that doesn’t sound robotic” – Blogger
- “The price point is perfect for small businesses” – Shop Owner
- “Love the right-click simplicity” – Social Media Manager
Common requests:
- Bulk processing feature
- Firefox extension
- More language options
- API access for developers
alttext.ai User Feedback
Based on WordPress plugin reviews (4.8/5 stars) and Shopify app reviews [4]: Modern solutions like automatic alt text streamline this process significantly.
Positive themes:
- “Saved 150 hours on our catalog” – E-commerce Manager
- “The API integration was seamless” – Developer
- “Multi-language support is excellent” – International Brand
- “Bulk processing is a game-changer” – Agency Owner
Common complaints:
- Pricing is high for small businesses
- Credits expire monthly (no rollover)
- Support response times can be slow
- Some languages produce lower quality results
Final Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Choose QuickAltText If:
- ✅ You’re on a budget (under $50/month)
- ✅ You primarily work in English
- ✅ You want the fastest generation speed
- ✅ You prefer simple, right-click workflows
- ✅ You’re a content creator, blogger, or small business
- ✅ You need WCAG 2.2 compliance
- ✅ You value simplicity over features
Choose alttext.ai If:
- ✅ You need multiple language support
- ✅ You require bulk processing
- ✅ You want API access for automation
- ✅ You use Shopify/WooCommerce/Magento
- ✅ You’re processing 10,000+ images monthly
- ✅ You need team collaboration features
- ✅ You want maximum integration options
The Hybrid Approach
Some power users actually use both:
- QuickAltText for daily content creation and quick fixes
- alttext.ai for bulk imports and automated workflows
This gives you the best of both worlds – speed for individual images and automation for large batches.
Our Honest Recommendation
While we’d love everyone to choose QuickAltText, we believe in helping you find the right fit:
- For 80% of users: QuickAltText offers better value – more images for less money with faster generation
- For the 20% who need: Multi-language support, API access, or massive scale – alttext.ai is worth the premium
The good news? Both tools offer free trials. Test them yourself:
- QuickAltText: 7-day free trial with 100 images
- alttext.ai: 25 free credits to start
Start Your Alt Text Journey
Ready to make your images accessible? Here’s how to get started:
Try QuickAltText Free for 7 Days
- ✅ 100 free images to test
- ✅ No credit card required
- ✅ Install in 30 seconds
- ✅ Cancel anytime
Join 2,000+ content creators making the web more accessible
References
- alttext.ai official website, “About Us” section, accessed June 2025.
- alttext.ai pricing page, https://alttext.ai/pricing, accessed June 2025.
- Chrome Web Store Reviews, QuickAltText extension page, June 2025.
- WordPress Plugin Directory, “Alt Text AI” plugin reviews, June 2025.
- Shopify App Store, “AltText.ai” app ratings and reviews, June 2025.
- WebAIM, “The WebAIM Million – 2024 accessibility report,” February 2024.
- W3C, “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2,” October 2023.
- Google Search Central, “Image SEO best practices,” Updated December 2024.
Disclosure: This comparison was created by the QuickAltText team. We’ve made every effort to present information accurately and fairly. Prices and features are current as of June 2025 but may change. Please verify current details on each service’s website before making a decision.